ACIA og IPCC: en sammenligning av mottakelsen i amerikansk offentlighet
In: CICERO report 2005,4
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: CICERO report 2005,4
In: Global environmental politics, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 8-29
ISSN: 1536-0091
This article offers a comparative analysis of the emergence of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) activities and strategies in three multinational oil and gas companies. Exxon/ExxonMobil was first to make plans for a major, pioneering CCS project, but later pursued a relatively cautious strategy. In contrast, BP showed little interest in CCS up until 1997, but from that point on developed a particularly ambitious strategy. Statoil, meanwhile, has been relatively strongly involved in CCS activities for a long time. An explanatory framework with potential for wider application is developed, highlighting how the overall compatibility of CCS with oil and gas industry characteristics created a strategic dilemma for the companies. In explaining their responses, the article emphasizes the process towards institutionalization of CCS as a widely recognized mitigation option, and the three companies' different climate change strategies.
In: Global environmental politics, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 8-29
ISSN: 1526-3800
World Affairs Online
In: Environmental politics, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 227-245
ISSN: 1743-8934
In: Environmental politics, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 227-246
ISSN: 0964-4016
In: International studies perspectives: ISP, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 285-303
ISSN: 1528-3585
In: International studies perspectives: a journal of the International Studies Association, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 285-303
ISSN: 1528-3577
World Affairs Online
In: International studies perspectives: a journal of the International Studies Association, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 285-303
ISSN: 1528-3577
In: Journal of international relations and development: JIRD, official journal of the Central and East European International Studies Association, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 285-303
ISSN: 1408-6980
VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes 2556 ; The objective of this study is to give an overview of the potential for applying CCS in the Nordic countries (Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway and Iceland). The realistic potential of CCS in the region has been evaluated by taking into account existing and future energy systems and policies, emission sources, potential storage sites, technological, economical and political constraints as well as public acceptance. Special attention has been given to identifying promising regional CCS solutions that would have a significant CO2 emission reduction potential and could possibly involve cooperation between Nordic countries with synergical benefits for these. The report includes mapping of CO2 emissions in the Nordic countries from major sources, mapping and quantification of storage possibilities as well as scenarios of possible future CCS deployment in the region. In addition to the mapping, an overview of relevant CCS technology development and R&D activities in the Nordic countries is given. Public awareness of CCS, energy and climate policy frameworks, as well as political issues relevant to the deployment of CCS in the Nordic countries are also addressed.
BASE